Ghaouri Co-residence

As Camarano (1999) the aged ones are in better conditions of life of what the young, with this author does not want to say that the aged ones are in good conditions in absolute terms, and yes that the majority of the aged ones possesss proper house and a fixed income; this condition propitiates a bigger aid in the familiar budget on the part of these. In the homes whose aged they command meets a ratio significant of children liveing together, ratio this that grows with the time. The author explains that this situation occurs for the transformations that the Brazilian economy passes, culminating in great difficulties in the insertion and continuity of the young in the work market. Moreover, precocious pregnancy, prostitution, violence, drugs are phenomena that have increased enter population segment younger re-echo in the aged ones. Paraphrasing with Camarano and El Ghaouri (2003) some explanations for the occurrence of the co-residence (co-residence means to live in one same house with some generations) it is the fact of that the aged ones are living more and the young is postponing the age where they leave the house of parents. The period where the children pass as dependents of its parents if has increased, due to instability in the work market, what it makes it difficult the purchase of the proper house and the auto-sustenance; the biggest time expended in the studies and the instability of the loving relations, what it results together in the return of the children for the house of the parents with the grandsons. The co-residence consists as strategy of mutual aid between the generations. It has a privatization of the social problems for the private sphere, the family gains centralidade for the cares of its members, independently of this to have conditions substances to attend these. Alencar (2006, p.62) citing Telles (1992; 1996) affirm that the family is a species of ethical, moral and material guarantee, characterized for the logic of the destitution and privation of rights.


The results of the evaluation that pupils of Average Ensino had made in 2010 had been known at the beginning of this week. As always, the famous way of the interpretations of the numbers is initiated. The press in weight detached a point in special? the best note average of the particular schools, comparing them with the public schools. That is a fact! Now, to make of this a base to affirm that the particular school is better that the public is a humbug. This is not a truth. As all we know, the numbers are cold and are the people manipulate who it in accordance with what they want to defend. Any one that is not involved with the education ' ' on the inside ' ' it would not have to take the data literally.

In fact, of 100 better notes in the Enem-2010, only 13 are public (being all federal ones? military, Caps or technician). If the number to go up for the 1,000 first the result is still worse? but 74 are of the public net. I agree that the first thought of a pupil father must be of that its son must study in a particular school, therefore the public schools are ' ' piores' '. The society as a whole, also the periodicals, had made this interpretation. I have that to say that they are been deceptive. I am a defender of the public school. more, I find that particular education is a reproducer of the social inaqualities. ALL THE SCHOOLS WOULD HAVE TO BE PUBLIC. In such a way, I doubt that I would lack resources and I guarantee that education would be of quality, therefore the influential sectors of the society would have its children studying there. To go direct to the point, what I want to defend is that the difference between the public and private school is the social condition of the pupil.