What is easier? To motivate an unsatisfied employee I complete with it on the subject? Or To disappear that demotivation redesigning more efficient and effective processes? The book of Jim Collins, Good to Great, in the named chapter First Who As soon as, criticism the efforts that make the companies motivate their employees, reinforcing the author, that if you have to people and the correct processes, is not necessary to motivate them, they makes single it, nevertheless the companies in many occasions does all the necessary one to demotivate them, and here the shift of paradigm: You do not dedicate resources to motivate to the personnel, enfcate better in not demotivating them. When finishing the reading, I remembered a book of the Scott sketcher Adams, the Principle of Dilbert, and whose final chapter, a New Enterprise model: F5, defines what is a F5 company, that is to say, Fuera to 5. . The author comments that a company must look for that their employees are more effective, and the unique form is the motivation that they they will have because they know that they will leave at the time of normal exit of the company. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from Charles Schwab Corporation . The motivation, says the author, is given by increases of happiness that the employee in the time secures that he has outside the work. That is to say, they will do all the necessary one to finish its activities within the schedule. This form to think, could possibly be applied in these times of crisis, where on the one hand, the employers have abused the law of the supply and the labor demand, expressing the employees to work more hours of due and this consequently not to review its processes. The problem of the present organizational structures is its emphasis in the functional organization, in its control and authority.